Тенденции развития геоэкономики с точки зрения российско-украинского конфликта
(Стр. 230-237)

Российско-украинский конфликт не только оказал серьезное влияние на геополитическую ситуацию в регионе, но и нанес огромный удар по глобальному геоэкономическому порядку и развитию. США и Европа использовали финансовые, валютные, энергетические и другие геоэкономические инструменты для введения санкций против России, тем самым нарушая асимметричный баланс зависимостей в региональной геоэкономике. При подобной потере баланса, вся структура глобальной геоэкономической модели претерпела перерегуляцию и изменение курса. В этом контексте большое практическое значение имеет исследование дефиниции для геоэкономики, уточнение путей ее развития, а также изучение будущей тенденции развития геоэкономики.

Дин Ю.., (2022), ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ ГЕОЭКОНОМИКИ С ТОЧКИ ЗРЕНИЯ РОССИЙСКО-УКРАИНСКОГО КОНФЛИКТА. Проблемы экономики и юридической практики, 4 => 230-237.

Edward Luttwak. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce[J]. The National Interest, Vol.20, No. 3, 1990, P. 17.
G. John Ikenberry. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order, International Security, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Winter 1998/99), pp. 43-78.
Edward Luttwak. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce [J]. The National Interest, Vol.20, No.3, 1990, P. 19.
Matthew Sparke. From geopolitics to geoeconomics: Transnational state effects in the borderlands [J]. Geopolitics, Vol. 3, No. 2, Autumn 1998, p.66.
Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse. Geoeconomic Relations between the EU and China: The Lessons from the EU Weapon Embargo and From Galileo’, Geopolitics [J]., Volume 19, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 40-65.
Blackwill R. D., Harris J. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. p. 20.
Gyula Csurgai, The Increasing Importance of Geoeconomics in Power Rivalries in the Twenty-First Century [J], Geopolitics, Published online: 27 Oct 2017, P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1359547.
Pascal Lorot, Introduction à la géoéconomie [M]. Paris: Institut européen de géoéconomie, 1999, p. 15.
Mikael Wigell, Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism [J]. Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 14, 2016, pp. 135-151.
Johan Adriaensen, Evgeny Postnikov. A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy? EU Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific [M]. Witzerland, Palgrave Macmilla, 2022, P. 7.
Sattich T, Inderberg T. EU Geoeconomics: A Framework for Analyzing Bilateral Relations in the European Union [J]. Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 57. Number 3. 2019, p. 502.
Gladkii Yu.N., Nikitina M.G., and Marunenko N.V., Geographical Economy: A Subject of Investigation and Development Tendencies [J]. Izv. Rus. Geogr. Obshch., 2004, p. 3.
S. S. Lachininskii. Current Trends in Geoeconomic Studies in Russia [J]. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2012, p. 81.
Blackwill R. D., Harris J. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. p. 154.
Blackwill R. D., Harris J. War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016. p. 154.
Felix Gilbert, To the Farewell Address: Ideas of Early American Foreign Policy [M]. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1970, pp. 111-115.
亚当·斯密 《国富论》 下卷 [M] 郭大力、王亚南译 商务印书馆2014年版 第32-40页。
大卫·李嘉图 《政治经济学及赋税原理》[M] 丰俊功译 光明日报出版社2009年版 第21-28页。
Michael Lind, The Return of Geo-economics[J].The National Interest, November/December 2019, PP. 14-15.
George Kennan, The Sources of Soviet Conduct [J]. Foreign Affairs, July 1947, No 4; Vol. 25. PP. 566-582.
Michael Lind, The Return of Geo-economics [J]. The National Interest, November/December 2019, P. 17.
Henry Kissinger, White House Years [M]. Simon & Schuster, 2011, P. 317.
Krasner, S. D., State Power and the Structure of International Trade, World Politics[J], Volume 28 , Issue 3, April 1976, pp. 317-347.
Richard N. Cooper, Trade Policy is Foreign Policy[J], Foreign Policy, No. 9, Winter, 1972-1973. pp. 18-36.
Edward Luttwak. The Endangered American Dream: How to Stop the United States from Becoming a Third World Country and How to Win the Geo-Economic Struggle for Industrial Supremacy [M]. New York. Simon & Schuster, 1993, P. 257.
Mikael Wigell, Sören Scholvin and Mika Aaltola. Geo-economics and power politics in the 21st century: the revival of economic statecraft [M]. New York, Routledge, 2019, p. 4.
Markus Jaeger. Defense and Deterrence Against Geo-Economic Coercion: What Germany and the EU Can Learn from China and the United States [R]. No. 4 March 2022, http://chrome-extension://bocbaocobfecmglnmeaeppambideimao/pdf/viewer.html?file=https%3A%2F%2Fdgap.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Farticle_pdfs%2FDGAP-Report-2022-04-EN.pdf.
Eurostat. Energy represented 62% of EU imports from Russia [EB/OL]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220307-1.
ОТКРЫТЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ. Внешняя торговля России: итоги 2021 года [EB/OL]., https://journal.open-broker.ru/research/vneshnyaya-torgovlya-rossii-itogi-2021-goda/.
Владимир Киселев Газпром продолжает сокращать экспорт газа в Европу, нефть все еще хорошо продается, криптозима в Coinbase [EB/OL] https://smart-lab.ru/blog/811653.php.
Julian Lee. Russia's Crude Flows to Asia Take Hold Near Unprecedented Levels [EB/OL]. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-13/russia-s-crude-flows-to-asia-take-hold-near-unprecedented-levels#xj4y7vzkg.
谢宝剑、朱小敏 地缘经济研究进展[J].社会科学 2019年第10期 第32页。
Jeremi Suri, Benjamin Valentino, State Finance and National Power: Great Britain, China, and the United States in Historical Perspective [R], Tobin Project discussion paper on «Sus-tainable National Security Strategy», 2016. p. 5.
European Commission. REPower EU: A plan to rapidly reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels and fast forward the green transition [EB/OL]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_3131.
Barton J. R., «Flags of Convenience»: Geoeconomics and Regulatory Minimisation’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie [J]. Volume 90, Issue 2, 1999, pp. 142-155.
Gyula Csurgai, The Increasing Importance of Geoeconomics in Power Rivalries in the Twenty-First Century [J], Geopolitics, Published online: 27 Oct 2017, PP. 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1359547.
Edward Luttwak. From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce [J]. The National Interest, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1990, P. 17.
Mikael Mattlin, Mikael Wigell. Geoeconomics in the context of restive regional powers [J]. Asia Europe Journal, No. 14, 2016, p. 126.
White House. National Security Strategy of the United States of America[R]. The White House, December. 2017, P. 17. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/2017.pdf.
Johan Adriaensen, Evgeny Postnikov, A Geo-Economic Turn in Trade Policy? EU Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific [M]. Switzerland, Palgrave Macmilla, 2022, P. 4.
Mikael Wigell, Sören Scholvin and Mika Aaltola. Geo-economics and power politics in the 21st century: the revival of economic statecraft [M]. New York, Routledge, 2019, p. 54.
Daniel Bell, The cultural contradictions of capitalism: twentieth anniversary edition, New York: Basic Books, 1996, p. 330.

российско-украинский конфликт, геоэкономика, развитие.